Schuler Capital Management LLC
  • Approach
    • What Makes Us Different
    • How We Work With Clients
    • About Us
  • Risk Model
    • Safeguard 1st Risk Model
    • Why Does It Work?
    • Risk Management vs Market Timing
    • Key Takeaways
    • What Is Safeguard 1st Telling Us Now? >
      • Current Safeguard 1st Signals
  • Reasons Why
    • Buy & Hold May Not Always Be Best
    • The Achilles Heel of the 60/40 Portfolio
    • Is Your Portfolio Really Diversified?
    • Cash Is Not Trash
    • Fees Matter
    • What To Know About Track Records
  • Approach
    • What Makes Us Different
    • How We Work With Clients
    • About Us
  • Risk Model
    • Safeguard 1st Risk Model
    • Why Does It Work?
    • Risk Management vs Market Timing
    • Key Takeaways
    • What Is Safeguard 1st Telling Us Now? >
      • Current Safeguard 1st Signals
  • Reasons Why
    • Buy & Hold May Not Always Be Best
    • The Achilles Heel of the 60/40 Portfolio
    • Is Your Portfolio Really Diversified?
    • Cash Is Not Trash
    • Fees Matter
    • What To Know About Track Records
​Why Does It Work?
 
Why does our risk management system work? 
  • Human Nature Drives Markets At Extremes
  • Academic Studies Have Confirmed Markets Are Driven By Consistent Human Behaviors
  • Indicators Can “Sense” Conditions Associated With The Extremes Coincident With Bull and Bear Markets
  • Those Who Study History Recognize Human Emotions Are Drivers Of Markets
  • A Willingness To Go To Cash Is An Advantage
  • Our Approach Is Not Attractive To Many Professional Investors And Large Institutions (Pensions/Insurance Companies)

​
Human Nature Drives Markets At Extremes
 
Our belief is that markets are driven by human emotions and crowd behavior at price extremes -- market tops and bottoms.  The fact that bubbles and panics have consistently occurred over the centuries and across many geographies and cultures is evidence that fear and greed, euphoria and despair, are universal emotions that can be relied upon to repeat themselves.  Because the human behavior repeats, certain measures of price, volume, divergences, breadth and monetary conditions, can be assumed to be correlated with market tops and bottoms.

Past behavior....
Picture

Same behavior.  We all still get on the train!
Picture


​Academic Studies Have Confirmed Markets Are Driven By Consistent Human Behaviors
 
In 2005, Kevin Lansing authored a study at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco in which he created a behavior model to test his hypotheses about human behavior and stock market bubbles.  His model showed that it doesn’t take very much human error to generate extrapolative expectations.  If people start believing, even for a short time, that recent trends are the new normal, they will start paying higher prices, which locks the trend in place and lends credence to their belief.  Eventually things spiral out of control before they come to their senses.  According to Lansing, investors have rational incentives to economize on the costs of collecting and processing information. “The most readily available and least costly information about the future value of a variable is its past value.”
  Source:  http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/files/wp04-06bk.pdf
 
​
Those Who Study History Recognize Human Emotions Are Drivers Of Markets
“It’s the swings of psychology that get people into the biggest trouble, especially since investors’ emotions invariably swing in the wrong direction at the wrong time. When things are going well people become greedy and enthusiastic, and when times are troubled, people become fearful and reticent.” – Howard Marks
 
“The stock market is a manifestation of crowd psychology in action.” - Edson Gould
 
“Bull markets are born on pessimism, grown on skepticism, mature on optimism and die on euphoria.  The time of maximum pessimism is the best time to buy, and the time of maximum optimism is the best time to sell.” - Sir John Templeton
 
“It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence which could support this.” - Bertrand Russell
 
“Men, it has been well said, think in herds. It will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.”
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds - Charles MacKay – 1841
 
“Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule."  Beyond Good and Evil - Freidrich Nietzsche – 1886 ​

​The fact that bubbles, crashes and panics have consistently occurred throughout history is evidence that irrational human behavior drives markets to unreasonable levels.  Some examples are provided below:
  • Dutch tulip 1593 bubble
  • English South Sea 1720 bubble
  • French Mississippi 1720 bubble
  • 1920s Florida land boom bubble
  • Wall Street 1929 stock market bubble
  • Brazilian 1971 stock market crash
  • Kuwait 1982 stock market crash
  • Japanese 1989 real estate and stock market bubbles
  • Dot-com bubble 2000
  • US housing and mortgage 2005 – 2007 bubbles
  • Wall Street 2008 stock market crash
  • And the latest potential candidate, Bitcoin (2018)?
 
In summary, human emotions drive markets at extremes.  Past human behavior will be similar to future human behavior.  If we can identify indicators whose measures are associated with market extremes, we will be able to identify periods in which market risk is much higher or much lower than average.
  
 
Indicators Can “Sense” Conditions Associated With The Extremes Coincident With Bull and Bear Markets
 
John Hussman of the Hussman Funds  describes the value of using a combination of indicators together as a way to manage risk:
“The key to drawing useful information out of noisy data is to rely on multiple “sensors.” Alone, each sensor may capture only a small portion of the true signal, and may not be greatly useful in and of itself. The power comes when the sensors are used together in order to distinguish the common signal of interest from the surrounding noise.  In the financial markets, useful sensors include valuations, price action, overbought/oversold measures, breadth, leadership, sentiment, credit market behavior, volatility, economic factors, and many others.”
 
“I should also be clear that these signatures are not forecasts, but classifications that we’ve constructed to identify highly unusual events.  The difference is that a forecast says “we expect this particular outcome in this specific instance,” while a classifier says “we identify the same signature of conditions that has regularly preceded this particular outcome in the past.”  It’s a subtle distinction, but an important one.  We needn't rely on forecasts.  Rather, we continue to align ourselves with the prevailing evidence at each point in time, and our outlook will shift as the evidence does.”
 
Indicators are objective and based on data.  As Hussman noted above, indicators are best used when their signals are combined into a model, which is exactly what we have done with the Safeguard 1st Risk Model.
 

Our Willingness To Go To Cash Is An Advantage
 
Being out of the market and in cash inherently reduces risk.  See Cash Is Not Trash.   Black Swan Events are unforeseeable and occur randomly.  For these reasons, being out of the market completely and in cash a certain percentage of the time is by definition more robust and less risky than being in the market all of the time.
 

Our Methods Are Not Attractive To Many Professional Investors And Large Institutions (Pensions/Insurance Companies)
 
All quantitative investors and traders know that systems will work as long as they are not discovered.  As more participate in a successful strategy, the excess returns from that strategy disappear.  A number of features of our Safeguard 1st Risk Model are unattractive to institutions and large investors.
 
Immediate action/response must be taken when signals are generated.  A traditional investment committee may meet on the third Thursday following the end of a quarter. Such a structure would be much too slow to react to the much faster pace of our risk-management strategy.
Picture
​
​One must be willing to get into/out of the market completely.  Our studies show that small, gradual adjustments to the percentage of allocations among different asset classes in a portfolio produces worse performance than Buy & Hold and doesn’t reduce risk by very much.  Professionals have career risk if they make bold moves that cause their performance to deviate from their peers or the market.  Our strategies provide real risk reduction because they can go to a 100% cash position when risk is high and back to being fully invested when risk subsides.
 
Investors must follow the system by maintaining strict discipline, keeping emotions out of the investment process.  Few retail investors or even professionals have the discipline to act continuously in an unbiased manner.  The Risk Model may not always work, and one must maintain complete faith and continue to abide by the signals.
 
Continued Belief and Adherence By the Majority of Asset Managers to the Efficient-Market Hypothesis (EMH).   Developed by Professor Eugene Fama, EMH states that asset prices fully reflect all available information.  In other words, there is no way to get an edge on the market and movements in the stock market are attributable to “noise.”   
A growing body of academic evidence disputes EMH, but as long as EMH is widely believed and followed, technical risk-management systems will continue to work.
Disclosures & Backtesting Results Disclaimer
Contact
Legal
Privacy Policy
Internet Communications Notice